Remote Non-Stop (Debugging with ROCGDB)

Next: Packet Acknowledgment, Previous: Notification Packets, Up: Remote Protocol [Contents][Index]

### E.10 Remote Protocol Support for Non-Stop Mode

ROCGDB’s remote protocol supports non-stop debugging of multi-threaded programs, as described in Non-Stop Mode. If the stub supports non-stop mode, it should report that to ROCGDB by including ‘`QNonStop+`’ in its ‘`qSupported`’ response (see qSupported).

ROCGDB typically sends a ‘`QNonStop`’ packet only when establishing a new connection with the stub. Entering non-stop mode does not alter the state of any currently-running threads, but targets must stop all threads in any already-attached processes when entering all-stop mode. ROCGDB uses the ‘`?`’ packet as necessary to probe the target state after a mode change.

In non-stop mode, when an attached process encounters an event that would otherwise be reported with a stop reply, it uses the asynchronous notification mechanism (see Notification Packets) to inform ROCGDB. In contrast to all-stop mode, where all threads in all processes are stopped when a stop reply is sent, in non-stop mode only the thread reporting the stop event is stopped. That is, when reporting a ‘`S`’ or ‘`T`’ response to indicate completion of a step operation, hitting a breakpoint, or a fault, only the affected thread is stopped; any other still-running threads continue to run. When reporting a ‘`W`’ or ‘`X`’ response, all running threads belonging to other attached processes continue to run.

In non-stop mode, the target shall respond to the ‘`?`’ packet as follows. First, any incomplete stop reply notification/‘`vStopped`’ sequence in progress is abandoned. The target must begin a new sequence reporting stop events for all stopped threads, whether or not it has previously reported those events to ROCGDB. The first stop reply is sent as a synchronous reply to the ‘`?`’ packet, and subsequent stop replies are sent as responses to ‘`vStopped`’ packets using the mechanism described above. The target must not send asynchronous stop reply notifications until the sequence is complete. If all threads are running when the target receives the ‘`?`’ packet, or if the target is not attached to any process, it shall respond ‘`OK`’.

If the stub supports non-stop mode, it should also support the ‘`swbreak`’ stop reason if software breakpoints are supported, and the ‘`hwbreak`’ stop reason if hardware breakpoints are supported (see swbreak stop reason). This is because given the asynchronous nature of non-stop mode, between the time a thread hits a breakpoint and the time the event is finally processed by ROCGDB, the breakpoint may have already been removed from the target. Due to this, ROCGDB needs to be able to tell whether a trap stop was caused by a delayed breakpoint event, which should be ignored, as opposed to a random trap signal, which should be reported to the user. Note the ‘`swbreak`’ feature implies that the target is responsible for adjusting the PC when a software breakpoint triggers, if necessary, such as on the x86 architecture.

Next: Packet Acknowledgment, Previous: Notification Packets, Up: Remote Protocol [Contents][Index]